Alana D. Chips writes a favorable essay on hypnosis . . . when I count to 10, you will be enlightened . . . however, while informing and advocating for hypnosis, she includes a few misconceptions of her own. Hypnosis is not a state between awake and asleep, that would be the hypnoidal state which is not hypnosis. In hypnosis, the subconscious does not become more prevalent, it’s always there . . . rather, the critical factor of the conscious mind is bypassed. And the rest. Still, nice to see something favorable and generally accurate. Generally. A few worthwhile points as well.