A photo does NOT always prove what a person may claim it means . . . a photo of some guy with an attractive woman does not always mean that he’s had sex with that woman. Sure, the photo could be a photograph of a fellow with a woman he has dated or had sex with it . . . but it could also be his second cousin’s nephew’s niece visiting for a family outing or even a complete and total stranger in any of an infinite non-sexual contexts.

Recently, there has been a spate of "show me the proof" type posts on some of the so-called seduction sites where different gurus of dating make claims that they sleep with hotter women than anyone else . . . and in order to proove it, they have started posting photos of themeselves with different women with the claim that the women in the photos are all hot babes that the guru has slept with.

Well . . . while the whole juvenile locker room game certainly has it’s inherent voyeristic thrill . . . the photos don’t actually "prove" anything.

Some of the so-called photos of proof of success are obviously photoshop jobs . . . see the photo here for an idea of what I mean. Others are photos of girls by themselves certainly can’t be considered evidence that the person posting the photos has even met the girls, let alone slept with them. Still others are more credible . . . they show the "guru" in all his unkemtness or dorkiness actually physically standing in the photo with a reasonably attractive woman or three . . . however, all that means is that a photo was taken. Such photos do NOT prove that anyone has been having sex with anyone else in the photos. The party photos are filled with poses which could simply be courtesy poses . . . just as the guy who asks a booth babe at a computer show to pose with him gets a nice memento of the occassion but it doesn’t mean he’s slept with the girl.

Personally, I would suggest that the guys posting photos with claims of sexual adventure are stuck on selling an idea of themselves a la sophomoric head games and braggery than any actual skills for meeting and interacting with women in a real and healthy manner.

Evidently, the guys who don’t post photos are thought to be losers who can’t possibly be successful but the ones who do post photos are only proving it.

You know, since a photo can be faked or claimed to be something it isn’t, the only real proof would be video . . . but most of these guys aren’t going to post video of themselves talking to women . . . let alone seducing them and headin’ to the bedroom . . . at least the guys here post videos of themselves in action with analysis, even the failures.

Here are a few of the recent photo posts:

• Bishop
• Bishop Comments
• Cliff’s List Pre-Party
• Cliff’s List Pre-Party Comments
• Gunwitch

Note that the last parody bit is NSFW. BTW, as far as you know, I have never actually physically met either Nicole Kidman or Angelina Jolie . . . or, at least, if I had indeed had sex with either of these women, singly and/or together, I would not tell you I have . . . although I am perfectly happy to admit that I enjoy their films and find them both to be highly attractive actresses.